WEKO3
アイテム
代名詞の関連性理論的分析
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/1549
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/1549c79caa29-745c-4f8f-a8d9-e40300249c48
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
jinbunkagaku_12_133_149.pdf (506.0 kB)
Restricted Access
|
学内限定
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper【学内限定】(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2012-03-15 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 代名詞の関連性理論的分析 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | ダイメイシ ノ カンレンセイ リロンテキ ブンセキ | |||||
| 言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Relevance Theoretic Analysis of Pronoun | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
松崎, 由貴
× 松崎, 由貴× Matsuzaki, Yuki |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 学習院大学大学院人文科学研究科 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The issue of how hearers interpret pronouns has been discussed by semanticists and pragmaticists． Relevance theorists have also tried to solve a general problem of how hearers interpret utterances， including the issue of interpreting pronouns． Powell（1998）， a relevance theorist was one who tried to analyze the interpretation of pronouns． In this paper， I will consider Powell’s relevance theoretlc analysis of pronouns with the particular function called‘‘deferred reference．”Then， I will point out problems of his analysis and propose improvements in the framework of relevance theory， by which I will try to analyze other types of pronouns． Powell（1998）accounted fbr a hearer’s interpretation of deferred reference in which indexicals introduce something other than a particul．ar individual or thing into the proposition expressed by the utterance． Powell argued that there are two processes in interpre口ng deferred references：semantic deferral and pragmatic deferral． In the f（）rmer process， a hearer fbllows a procedural meaning of a pronoun without being constrained by the principle of relevance． After that task， the且atter， where a hearer retrieves the index as a target in terms of the output of the semantic deferral as a trigger， is carried out under the principle of relevance． Those processes are different from what Sperber and Wilson said． However， two problems will be raised by Powell’s accounしThe first concerns semantic deferral． It is doubtful that a hearer only recovers the meaning of pronouns without being constrai．ned by the principle of relevance． The second concerns at which level of the meaning a hearer finds an index of deferred reference． Powell claimed that the index appeared in the proposition expressed by the utterance． lt， however， might occur in implicature． In my opinion， the principle of relevance effects semantic deferral in interpreting a pronoun． It seems va且id that the pragmatic deferral proposed by Powell is replaced by two processes， saturation and ad hoc concept construction in deriving the proposition expressed by the utterance and explicatures． That hypothesis makes the proposition expressed true． Furthermore， the fina且index of deferred reference contributes to implicature． That hypothesis could also be applied to the interpretation of other types of pronouns． Besides， particular processes only for deferred reference are not required． It results in the consistency of general processes i．n the framework of relevance theory． | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 学習院大学人文科学論集 en : Gakushuin University studies in humanities 号 12, p. 133-149, 発行日 2003-10-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09190791 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10398283 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| URI | ||||||
| 識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/10959/1549 | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | HDL | |||||
