@article{oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003903,
 author = {松崎, 由貴 and Matsuzaki, Yuki},
 issue = {12},
 journal = {学習院大学人文科学論集, Gakushuin University studies in humanities},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {application/pdf, The　issue　of　how　hearers　interpret　pronouns　has　been　discussed　by　semanticists and　pragmaticists．　Relevance　theorists　have　also　tried　to　solve　a　general　problem of　how　hearers　interpret　utterances，　including　the　issue　of　interpreting　pronouns． Powell（1998），　a　relevance　theorist　was　one　who　tried　to　analyze　the　interpretation of　pronouns．　In　this　paper，　I　will　consider　Powell’s　relevance　theoretlc　analysis of　pronouns　with　the　particular　function　called‘‘deferred　reference．”Then，　I　will point　out　problems　of　his　analysis　and　propose　improvements　in　the　framework　of relevance　theory，　by　which　I　will　try　to　analyze　other　types　of　pronouns． Powell（1998）accounted　fbr　a　hearer’s　interpretation　of　deferred　reference　in　which  indexicals　introduce　something　other　than　a　particul．ar　individual　or　thing　into　the proposition　expressed　by　the　utterance．　Powell　argued　that　there　are　two　processes in　interpre口ng　deferred　references：semantic　deferral　and　pragmatic　deferral．　In　the f（）rmer　process，　a　hearer　fbllows　a　procedural　meaning　of　a　pronoun　without　being constrained　by　the　principle　of　relevance．　After　that　task，　the且atter，　where　a　hearer retrieves　the　index　as　a　target　in　terms　of　the　output　of　the　semantic　deferral　as　a trigger，　is　carried　out　under　the　principle　of　relevance．　Those　processes　are　different from　what　Sperber　and　Wilson　said． 　However，　two　problems　will　be　raised　by　Powell’s　accounしThe　first　concerns semantic　deferral．　It　is　doubtful　that　a　hearer　only　recovers　the　meaning　of　pronouns without　being　constrai．ned　by　the　principle　of　relevance．　The　second　concerns　at which　level　of　the　meaning　a　hearer　finds　an　index　of　deferred　reference．　Powell claimed　that　the　index　appeared　in　the　proposition　expressed　by　the　utterance．　lt， however，　might　occur　in　implicature． In　my　opinion，　the　principle　of　relevance　effects　semantic　deferral　in　interpreting　a pronoun．　It　seems　va且id　that　the　pragmatic　deferral　proposed　by　Powell　is　replaced by　two　processes，　saturation　and　ad　hoc　concept　construction　in　deriving　the proposition　expressed　by　the　utterance　and　explicatures．　That　hypothesis　makes the　proposition　expressed　true．　Furthermore，　the　fina且index　of　deferred　reference contributes　to　implicature． 　That　hypothesis　could　also　be　applied　to　the　interpretation　of　other　types　of pronouns．　Besides，　particular　processes　only　for　deferred　reference　are　not　required． It　results　in　the　consistency　of　general　processes　i．n　the　framework　of　relevance theory．},
 pages = {133--149},
 title = {代名詞の関連性理論的分析},
 year = {2003},
 yomi = {マツザキ, ユキ}
}