ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学習院大学
  2. 附置研究施設等
  3. 外国語教育研究センター
  4. 言語文化社会
  5. (8)

語用論と意味論の違い

http://hdl.handle.net/10959/1212
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/1212
1ff8432f-8963-478d-884f-d1292c5fd0f9
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
gengobunkashakai_8_55_71.pdf gengobunkashakai_8_55_71.pdf (262.6 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2012-03-15
タイトル
タイトル 語用論と意味論の違い
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル ゴヨウロン ト イミロン ノ チガイ
言語 ja-Kana
タイトル
タイトル Pragmatics/Semantics Distinction
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 岡田, 聡宏

× 岡田, 聡宏

WEKO 48405

ja 岡田, 聡宏

ja-Kana オカダ, トシヒロ

Search repository
Okada, Toshihiro

× Okada, Toshihiro

WEKO 48406

en Okada, Toshihiro

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Central to the formal semantics tradition, especially to the tradition of truth conditional semantics, has been the equation of the meaning of a sentence with its truth condition (the condition under which a given proposition is true). Some semanticists believe that the sentence meaning is identical to the proposition of the sentence, and the proposition is determined exclusively by semantics without relying on pragmatics, except in very limited cases. Pragmaticists or contextualists, on the other hand, claim that the recovery of the proposition inevitably involves pragmatic processes, and it cannot be determined without considering the context. The sentence meaning itself is incomplete in many ways, because it contains underdetermined elements including indexicals and demonstratives as well as ambiguous words or phrases. It needs to be developed by such pragmatic processes as reference assignment, disambiguation, and saturation in order to be a full-fledged proposition. In her ultra-minimalist view, Carston (2007) claims that semantics is concerned only with LEM (Linguistically Encoded Meaning), which is the only context-free meaning, and that the semantics/pragmatics distinction for at least natural languages holds between LEM and speaker meaning. She also claims that LEM is the ultimate representational output of grammar, and that the only distinction that works may be a syntax/pragmatics distinction. More careful examination may be needed before we accept her claim, but it is true that semantics has no autonomous role in determining the truth condition of a sentence, and the recovery of the proposition always involves pragmatic processes.
書誌情報 ja : 言語 文化 社会
en : Language, Culture and Society

号 8, p. 55-71, 発行日 2010-03-31
出版者
出版者 学習院大学外国語教育研究センター
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 13479105
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11820089
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 14:41:08.985755
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3