WEKO3
アイテム
世阿弥の能楽論における 「見風」 : 「かかり」 との関係から
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/844
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/84414680d18-6c68-4885-8243-e48504d88a83
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-03-15 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 世阿弥の能楽論における 「見風」 : 「かかり」 との関係から | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | ゼアミ ノ ノウガク ニオケル ケンプウ カカリ トノ カンケイ カラ | |||||
言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Kenpu in Zeami's Theory of Noh : In Relationship with Kakari | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
宮本, 郷史
× 宮本, 郷史× Miyamoto, Satoshi |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The aim of this thesis is to place Kenpu as a primal foundation when observing ideas of Zeami. Kakari, the terminology Zeami frequently refers, has been considered one of the most crucial concept in Zeami’s theory of Noh in the past Zeami study. By letting Kakari happen in the performance of Noh, Hana, the accomplishment of Noh Plays which was Zeami’s lifetime pursuit, was drawn the closest. Kakari is also the most fundamental element of ideal Hana. It’s impossible to look into Zeami’s ideas without recognizing this concept. On this thesis, we are to discuss Kenpu, which is remarked as important as Kakari, by treating Kakari as a keystone. This is a vital procedure since terminologies were rated equally essential. Kakari is referred as Ongyoku (auditory aspect of Noh), Kenpu as Mai (Visual aspect of Noh) and they were precicely told apart. In “Shikado”, Zeami discusses Kenpu as the element eligible for naming Karkari. Details of these two terminology has so many characteristics and effects in common. Moreover, Kenpu is the phase as substantial as Kakari to let Hana happen. There’s no doubt abut the fact that he differentiated two. The question of why and how Zeami used these two words naturally occurs next. There are two reasons to be explained. Firstly, Kakari was the terminology in the theory of Renga. He meant to establish Kakari in Mai. Secondary, he had been searching for the terminology which can contain similar characteristics and effects Kakari has in Renga context. From those ovservations above, we could conclude that centering Kenpu in the theory of Noh will take us deeper into Zeami’s ideas. By re-assembling various concepts in the theory of Noh from the viewpoint of Kenpu in consideration, we will be able to capture Zeami profile from very interesting angle. | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 学習院大学人文科学論集 en : Gakushuin University studies in humanities 号 18, p. 1-30, 発行日 2009-10-31 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 学習院大学大学院人文科学研究科 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09190791 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN10398283 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/10959/844 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |