WEKO3
アイテム
『義臣解難』小論 : 赤穂浪士討入り事件をめぐる論争史のために (赤穂事件に関する文芸と思想)
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2761
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2761deb536c0-e967-47fe-bec2-5806a13e04cf
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2013-03-15 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 『義臣解難』小論 : 赤穂浪士討入り事件をめぐる論争史のために (赤穂事件に関する文芸と思想) | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | ギシン カイナン ショウロン アコウ ロウシ ウチイリ ジケン オ メグル ロンソウシ ノ タメ ニ アコウ ジケン ニカンスル ブンゲイ ト シソウ | |||||
言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | A Critique of Gishin Kainan : A Historical Review of the Debate on the Forty-Seven Ronin Incident | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
國領, 不二男
× 國領, 不二男× Kokuryo, Fujio |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Gishin Kainan was written by Matsumura Kyazan(松村九山),a Confucian scholar and doctor from Ono han(大野藩)in Echizen(越前)province. Gishin(義臣10yal retainer) refers to the fortyseven(or six)γδ痂of Akδ, a castle town in Harima province, and kainαn (解難)to Dazai Shundai’s(太宰春台)treatise on theγδπ勿, in which he rehabilitated their name. Matsumura criticized Dazai’s treatise,幽σS勧露γo肋s雇~oπ(赤穂四十六士論 Treatise on the Forty-Seven〔or six〕R6nin of Ak6),focusing on the folIowing points. 1) The usage of the terms raihei(来聰imperial envoy)and Yamashiro Tenn6(山 城天皇Emperor Yamashiro); 2) The reasons for and interpretation of the vendetta; 3) The lengthy delay before Oishi Yoshio(大石良雄)and the other forty・sixγδη勿 carried out their raid, in 1702,0n Kira Yoshinaka’s吉良義央residence; 4) The question of whether theγ伽勿held a grudge against the s妨g〃πor Kira, who was master of ceremonies III the s勿g襯’s palace. The meaning of loyalty is also considered here with respect to the views of Dazai, Matsumura, and Goi RanshU(五井蘭洲),which are comparatively discussed;and 5)The ethicality of the forty・six in waiting for the bαkufu’s(幕府)sentence instead of taking the initiate to commit suicide. Matsumura’s criticisms show him to be nearly identical in position to Goi RanshU, a writer opposed to Dazai. Although Matsumura could sympathize with theγδη勿, he upheld the absoluteness of the shogun’s authority and thus opined that their behavior was contrary to the laws of the shogunate, However, Matsumura admired Oishi and his band for their bravery and Ioyalty in pursuing the will of their deceased rnaster. He also praised their prudehce in remaining within Iegal bounds and condoned their reasons for enacting their long-cherished ambition. His ideas contrasted sharply with Dazai’s opinion that not only did Oishi not fully comprehend the meaning of loyalty, but he also transgressed the samural code. | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 調査研究報告 号 18, p. 19-38, 発行日 1984-03 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 学習院大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09196536 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00146626 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2761 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |