WEKO3
アイテム
王位継承について : バークリーとヒュームによる世襲君主制に関する分析
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/0002002520
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/000200252082f7685c-a468-467a-a30c-c8d3863e474d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
jinbunkagaku_31_１_32.pdf
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-07-14 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 王位継承について : バークリーとヒュームによる世襲君主制に関する分析 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | オウイ ケイショウ ニツイテ バークリー ト ヒューム ニヨル セシュウ クンシュセイ ニカンスル ブンセキ | |||||
| 言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | On the Succession to the Throne : Analysis of Hereditary Monarchy in Berkeley and Hume | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | ヒューム | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 世襲君主制 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | バークリー | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 自然法 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 服従義務 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
太田和, 亜希子
× 太田和, 亜希子 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In this paper, I undertake a comparative study of two theories of hereditary monarchy. One theory is by George Berkeley, and the other is by David Hume. The comparison is intended to answer the following questions: First, how did Berkeley criticize the doctrine of passive obedience presented by William King, Archbishop of Dublin. And how did Hume defend the legitimacy of the kingship of George I（1714─1727）, who became king without inheriting the title? Second, how did Hume and Berkeley analyze the relationship between succession to the throne and religion. And tird, why should humans obey the law of nature? Berkeley’s and Hume’s views of political obligation are in sharp contrast. William King sought to offer an alternative principle to the Divine Right of Kings. Berkeley, however, was skeptical of William King’s doctrine of passive obedience. He held that King settled in Ireland during the Glorious Revolution because it was in conformity with God’s will. Hume, on the other hand, considers the advantages and disadvantages of a restricted monarchy when he discusses the Hanoverian king, who became a monarch without hereditary succession and maintained a stable throne. William King also argues that the throne rests on the principle that uses Christian doctrines, claiming that even if Adam had not been our ancestor, God would have qualified him as a king. Berkeley pointed out that there is a contradiction in his view: Berkeley stated that there is a law of nature, which is God’s command, that ‘You should not resist the supreme power’, and further divided it into two to explain why they ought to be obeyed. On the other hand, Hume argued for the benefits of a monarchy while also respecting the moderation of power. He held that since kingship depends on property, the advantages of a mixed constitution that restricted kingship. Ultimately, Hume saw that a restricted monarchy that guarantees people’s freedom and properties is more beneficial to society than absolute monarchy, or the oppressivement which people are tempted to overthrow. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 学習院大学人文科学論集 Gakushuin University studies in humanities 号 31, p. 1-32, 発行日 2022-10 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 学習院大学大学院人文科学研究科 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09190791 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10398283 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
