@article{oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000695,
 author = {山口, 拓夢 and Yamaguchi, Takumu},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {学習院大学人文科学論集, Gakushuin University studies in humanities},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {application/pdf, In　this　treatise，　I　have　made　clear　these　two　points：first，　the struture　of　the　text；second，　the　cultural　background　of　the　structure． 　　I　have　investigated　the　transition　of　the　type　of　the　intelligence． In　the　Homeric　age，　the　intelligence　ca11ed　METIS　was　highly estimated．　This　is　the　eminent　character　of　the　shamanistic culture．　The　word‘‘METIS”connotes　the　ability　to　cope　with　the flUCtUant　reality． 　　111the　age　of　Plato，　the　sophists，　the　rhetoricians，　the　doctors　and the　politicians　had　this　ability．　They　were，　however，　little　concerned with　the　ethical　aspect．　Plato　stood　against　this　type　of　i11telligence by　thinking　articulately　through　words．　But　the　third　type　of　the intelligence，　which　Plato　suggested，　is　still　insu伍cient　to　reach　the real　recognition　of　the　world．　We　must　once　get　out　of　the　linguistic dimension．},
 pages = {1--15},
 title = {思想のトポロジー、パイドロス篇の構造とその背後に潜むもの},
 year = {1994},
 yomi = {ヤマグチ, タクム}
}