{"created":"2023-05-15T14:24:24.034432+00:00","id":5626,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"01823df3-1aeb-4247-bb38-2c78f1c435ce"},"_deposit":{"created_by":15,"id":"5626","owners":[15],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5626"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005626","sets":["1253:1363:38:1458"]},"author_link":["48806","48807"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"21","bibliographicPageEnd":"32","bibliographicPageStart":"7","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"人文","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Jinbun","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"〈ロック─ライプニッツ問題〉といえば、従来はロック『人間知性論』（1690）とライプニッツ『人間知性新論』（1704）を認識論や言語論の観点から対照し、経験論と合理論の対立を確認するのが定番であった。それにひきかえ、両者が十七世紀の自然法論、正義論、政治哲学においてもきわめて重要な対抗関係にあることには殆ど注目されてこなかった。ライプニッツは1698年ロックの『統治二論』を取り寄せ、かつロックからも献本され、その第二篇の所有権論も読み、批判する。ただ、『人間知性論』に対して長編の『人間知性新論』を執筆したのとは異なり、『統治二論』については論文も覚書も遺していない。しかし、『新方法』から『正義の共通概念』にいたるライプニッツの法学著作の根底にあるのは、ホッブズやプーフェンドルフの主意主義に対する彼の主知主義的な主張にとどまらず、実はそれ以上に、ロックの唯名論的で自由主義的な自然法論（とくに私的所有権論）への批判とその克服の試みに他ならない。奴隷制に対する批判にも及ぶ《所有権＝厳格法への批判》は、「衡平」を中心に置くライプニッツ正義論の絶対に譲れぬ核心であった。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Regarding the topic of “Locke and Leibniz”, it has been standard practice to compare Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding（1690）with Leibniz’s Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain（1704） in terms of epistemology and linguistic theory, and to confirm the contrast between empiricism and rationalism. However, little attention has been paid to the fact that Leibniz differed from Locke profoundly in his views on natural law, justice and political philosophy. Around 1698, Leibniz received─through his correspondents in England─Locke’s Two Treatises of Government and also received one from Locke himself, not least its second part on “Civil Government”. For An Essay Leibniz wrote a very detailed argument in Nouveaux essais, whereas he left neither paper nor memorandum for Two Treatises. However, what pervades his legal-philosophical writings is, first of all, his criticism of Hobbes’ voluntarism and then his no less profound criticism of Locke’s liberalistic theory, in particular his concept of “property” in Two Treatises. Starting from his “three-stages theory” of natural law Leibniz criticizes Locke’s natural law that allows only “strict law”（“hurt no one!”）. Meanwhile, Leibniz ascribes to the principle of “equity”（“give each his due”）the more important role of supplementing or correcting “strict law”. Additionally, he places “piety”（“live honorably”）at the third highest level, in which everyone not only helps each other, but enters into a universal relationship with all and with God. Justice is the charity of the wise. Leibniz’s critique of slavery can also be interpreted as a successful application of his three-stage theory of justice.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"学習院大学人文科学研究所","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11841726","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"18817920","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"酒井, 潔","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"サカイ, キヨシ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"48806","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Sakai, Kiyoshi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"48807","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-05-06"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"jinbun_21_7_32.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.9 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"jinbun_21_7_32.pdf","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5626/files/jinbun_21_7_32.pdf"},"version_id":"f428bff6-8cbd-47b2-b338-fc3fae65af78"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"自然法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"所有権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"厳格法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"衡平","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"敬虔","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"natural law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"property","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"strict law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"equity","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"piety","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"『統治二論』の批判的読者としてのライプニッツ : 「所有権」概念を中心に","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"『統治二論』の批判的読者としてのライプニッツ : 「所有権」概念を中心に","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"トウチ　ニロン　ノ　ヒハンテキ　ドクシャ　トシテノ　ライプニッツ　ショユウケン　ガイネン　オ　チュウシン　ニ","subitem_title_language":"ja-Kana"},{"subitem_title":"Leibniz as a Critical Reader of Locke’s Two Treatises of Government","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"15","path":["1458"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-05-06"},"publish_date":"2023-05-06","publish_status":"0","recid":"5626","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["『統治二論』の批判的読者としてのライプニッツ : 「所有権」概念を中心に"],"weko_creator_id":"15","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-08-10T04:43:41.814286+00:00"}