@article{oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003344, author = {依田, 尚也 and YODA, Naoya}, issue = {23}, journal = {学習院大学人文科学論集, Gakushuin University studies in humanities}, month = {Oct}, note = {application/pdf, The purpose of the present study is to look back on past studies about feedback of Rorschach test in Japan and to prospect the future issues. The Rorschach test is one of the psychological examinations which is used widely, and well known in Japanese professional psychologists. This examination has two different codes called “a comprehensive system” and “a Kataguchi method”. A comprehensive system is evidenced based with quantitative information. In contrast, a Kataguchi method is “narrative based” and respects on the examination of the linguistic representation and the psychodynamic understanding of the client. In the comprehensive system, a method of the feedback called “RFBS (Rorschach feedback session)” is developed. In this method, testers show the table of Rorschach variables to clients to make sure understanding the interpretation. On the one hand, studies on RFBS have been piled up, which suggests that the procedure of RFBS is effective to form collaboration between clients and testers and to facilitate client’s self-understanding. So, it is considered that the Rorschach variables work like dream materials in psychoanalysis and which seems to have psychotherapeutic structures in RFBS. On the other hand, in a Kataguchi method, the way of the feedback has not systematized so far. And there is very little number of the studies on feedback itself. About the actual situation of the feedback and the way of training of this method, it is shown in future that it is necessary to clarify them. In this way, it is thought that it may be easy to use a comprehensive system with the aspect of the feedback than a Kataguchi method. However, even the testers in Kataguchi method are asked to integrate narrative elements in his life history with Rorschach’s variables in the feedback to serve for individual client. It is concluded that the narrative viewpoint should be respected like a Kataguchi method to develop the more effective feedback. Finally, R-PAS, the recenty developed Rorschach test system in the United States, is introduced as the innovative system that can facilitate the psychothera peutic collaboration between testers and clients. However, there are few practical reports on R-PAS in Japan, because it is not yet translated in Japanese. To the conclusion, it is suggested that it is necessary to estimate the psychotherapeutic signifi cance of R-PAS with examining how easy it is to make feedback session within and how easy do clients understand the R-PAS feedback.}, pages = {67--89}, title = {ロールシャッハ・テストのフィードバックに関する研究 : 我が国におけるこれまでの研究と今後の課題}, year = {2014}, yomi = {ヨダ, ナオヤ} }