WEKO3
アイテム
皇帝権力に関する再論 : あわせて富田孔明氏の反論に答える (伝統中国の政治理念と支配)
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2817
http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2817373aee39-4ac9-48eb-a6f6-6bd19d8f0461
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
toyobunka_1_57_88.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-03-15 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 皇帝権力に関する再論 : あわせて富田孔明氏の反論に答える (伝統中国の政治理念と支配) | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | コウテイ ケンリョク ニカンスル サイロン アワセテ トミタ コウメイシ ノ ハンロン ニ コタエル デントウ チュウゴク ノ セイジ リネン ト シハイ | |||||
| 言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Imperial Sovereignty in the Song Dynasty : A Reexamination (Traditional Chinese Political Ideology and Governance) | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
王, 瑞来
× 王, 瑞来× Wang, Ruilai |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In response to an article by Tomita Komei criticizing“On the Song Dynasty Premiership，”published by the author more than ten years ago， he attempts to expand his study of imperial sovereignty during the Song period． This paper is divided into two parts． Part one discusses the relationship between monarch and subject， especially between the emperors and their ministers， headed by premiers． This is the aspect receiving most criticism that undtle emphasis was Iaid on opposition between the emperor and his ministers． The author argues・that he did not overlook the cooperatin and interdependence aspects， but did not stress thern， either， because the focal point of the discussion at thet time was different． Now， from the viewpoint of rnutual restrictions posed by the Chinese traditional political structure and also on the basis of the Song dynasty source materials， the author discusses the relationship thet such restrictions presupPosed for interdependence between the emperor and his ministers under such a dominant political system． Part two focuses on the remonstration system under factional politics， concluding that remonstration officers in Chinese history， especially those of the Song dynasty， did not constitute a third power independent from sovereign and premiership． Rather， they were tools controlled by certain factions （mainly， ruling groups）in order to restrict imperial sovereignty and to strug91e other factions． | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 東洋文化研究 en : Journal of Asian cultures 号 1, p. 57-88, 発行日 1999-03-31 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 学習院大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13449850 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11335469 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| URI | ||||||
| 識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/10959/2817 | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | HDL | |||||
