@article{oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001088,
 author = {岡田, 聡宏 and Okada, Toshihiro},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {言語 文化 社会, Language, Culture and Society},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, In　parody　the　communicator　intentionally　re－presents　its　object　in　a　new context，　and　this　re－presenting　act　creates　a　gap　or　incongruity　between the　parody　and　its　object．　This　incongruity　produces　various　effects　which modify　the　recipient’scognitive　environment．　Wilson　and　Sperber　claim that　parody　is　based　on　resemblances　in　syntactic　and　lexical　form　and does　not　involve　resemblances　of　propositional　content－unlike　irony， which　is　invariably　based　on　interpretive　resemblαnce．　In　irony　the　communicator 　echoes　a　thought　attributed　to　someone　else　while　dissociating him　or　herself　from　it．　Interpretive　resemblance，　however，　can　be　involved in　parody　and　it　leads　to　a　similarity　rather　than　a　difference　between　the two．　When　both　interpretive　resemblance　and　an　attitude　of　dissociation occur　in　parody，　irony　can　appear．　It　is　possible　for　irony　to　co－occur　with parody　if　the　parodied　object　and　the　thought　being　echoed　in　irony　are the　same．　In　this　case　parody　and　irony　are　intricately　intertwined　with each　other　and　cannot　be　separated．　If　the　object　of　parody　is　different from　the　thought　being　echoed，　on　the　other　hand，　both　parody　and　irony occur　in　the　same　text，　but　they　contribute　to　it　separately．　While　there　are many　linguistic　and　literary　theories　on　parody　and　irony，　they　fail　to distinguish　instances　where　parody　and　irony　are　intricately　intertwined in　the　same　text　from　those　where　parody　and　irony　occur　separately．　It　is assumed　that　the　notion　of　interpretive　resemblance　and　the　expression　of adissociative　attitude　hold　the　key　to　the　solution．},
 pages = {1--25},
 title = {パロディとアイロニー : 相違と類似の観点から},
 year = {2004},
 yomi = {オカダ, トシヒロ}
}