@article{oai:glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001084,
 author = {岡田, 聡宏 and Okada, Toshihiro},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {言語 文化 社会, Language, Culture and Society},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, In　this　paper　I　reject　the　idea　that　figures　of　speech　such　as　aρosi（）pesis or　silence，　accumu　la　tion，　and　aporia　are　departures　from　the　norm　or breaches　of　a　rule　or　maxim　of　communication．　I　believe，　on　the　contrary， that　they　are　part　of　our　ordinary　and　natural　language　use，　which　need　no special　treatment．　It　is　assumed　that　the　utterance　interpretation　including the　comprehension　of　tropes　depends　upon　the　principle　of　relevance，　and the　hearer／reader’s　task　is　only　to　find　an　interpretation　which　is　consistent with　the　principle　of　relevance，　one　which　has　enough　cognitive　effects　to be　worth　the　hearer／reader’s　attention　without　putting　him　to　any　gratuitous 　effort　to　obtain　them．　Figures　of　speech　are　not　an　exception．　In　most cases　silence　does　not　have　an　explicature　and　its　interpretation　mainly depends　upon　the　recovery　of　implicatures．　Accumulation　is　a　figure　to accumulate　or　repeat　the　similar　expressions　excessively，　which　causes　an increase　in　processing　efforts．　These　extra　efforts，　however，　are　outweighed by　an　increase　in　cognitive　effects　achieved　through　the　recovery　of　the explicature，　which　may　then　encourage　the　reader　to　extend　the　context and　thereby　add　implicatures．　Aporia　is　interpreted　in　the　same　way．　What is　common　to　all　these　cases　is　that　the　interpretation　process　requires　some effort，　but　this　extra　effort　is　outweighed　by　a　gain　in　cognitive　effects． Thus，　the　interpretation　chosen　by　the　reader　is　the　one　which　is　consistent with　the　principle　of　relevance．},
 pages = {1--22},
 title = {沈黙・列挙・ためらい : 関連性からみた黙説法・列叙法・疑惑法},
 year = {2003},
 yomi = {オカダ, トシヒロ}
}